skip navigation
Home | Site Map | RSS FeedsRSS Feeds
Landmine Action

Campaigns

Landmine Action campaigns for the strengthening of international legislation to protect civilians from the effects of conflict. Landmine Action also has a particular focus on monitoring the UK’s position on conventional weapons issues in domestic and international fora.


Cluster munitions:
Landmine Action supports the process launched in Oslo in February 2007 in which 46 nations agreed to a declaration to work towards a prohibition on cluster munitions by 2008. Landmine Action calls on all governments to immediately stop the use of cluster munitions and engage fully in the process to ban these weapons.

Landmine Action has previously called for the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) to negotiate a new Protocol on cluster munitions. However, with the failure of this forum to address the issue seriously during five years of talks and with effective action now being taken by states through other processes, the CCW is no longer the most appropriate place to pursue a meaningful solution to the problem of cluster munitions.

In 2006, as a member of the international Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC), Landmine Action launched Product Recall, the UK campaign to ban cluster munitions. The campaign aims to raise public awareness and exert pressure on the UK government to stop their use of cluster munitions and work towards an international ban on the weapons.

Explosive Remnants of War (ERW):
The 2003 CLEAR UP! campaign called for states and other groups involved in conflict to take measures to minimise the risks and effects of explosive remnants of war (ERW) after the fighting has stopped. This campaign resulted in Protocol V of the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) which was ratified in May 2006 and came into force on 12 November 2006.

Anti-vehicle mines (AVMs):
Also within the CCW Landmine Action has called for stronger rules to protect civilian populations and humanitarian missions from the impact of anti-vehicle mines. Despite five years of discussions, the CCW failed to make progress towards a legally binding instrument that would effectively address the humanitarian problems posed by these weapons. Landmine Action calls for a prohibition on anti-vehicle mines but would support proposals that would offer any significant enhancement of protection to civilians.

Anti-personnel mines (APMs):
As the UK branch of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL), Landmine Action is also monitoring the UK Government’s compliance with their obligation under Article V of the Ottawa Treaty to clear the Falkland Islands of landmines by March 2009.

 

How you can help

Donate NowDonate Now
Help Landmine Action protect civilians from the effects of conflict.

Take ActionTake Action
Write to your MP, sign a petition, make your voice heard.

VolunteerVolunteer
Could you spare a few hours a week to help support our campaigns?

Endrit_and_Labinot-Rexhaj, Kosovo
Featured resources

News

Groundbreaking treaty banning cluster bombs achieved
29 May 2008
Cluster bomb survivors and campaigners rejoice over the groundbreaking and comprehensive treaty provisionally agreed in Dublin

Former military leaders send clear message to the UK Government ahead of cluster bomb treaty
19 May 2008
As negotiations begin in Dublin for a treaty banning cluster bombs, a group of senior former military leaders have spoken out against these weapons that have caused harm to civilians for over 40 years

Most British people believe UK cannot be a force for good unless it bans cluster bombs
15 May 2008
Nearly eight out of ten people (79%) in Great Britain think the government should support a worldwide ban on cluster bombs according to a new YouGov poll released today (15 May).


Publications

Counting the cost- The economic impact of cluster munition contamination in Lebanon
27 May 2008
This report seeks to estimate and project the economic cost of cluster munition contamination resulting from the 2006 conflict in Lebanon.

A convention beyond the Convention
19 May 2008
During the conferences of the Oslo Process some states have argued that the Convention text should be weakened so as to make it more likely that states either not currently taking part in the process, or within the process but expressing reservations will eventually sign. This report looks at how prohibition agreements have had relevance far beyond their formal terms and official signatories. The stigmatization of certain categories of weapons and methods of attack has been an important outcome of past deliberations and international treaties. It examines lessons learnt from a number of weapons prohibitions in order to substantiate these claims about the past importance and future potential of stigma.

Cluster munitions- A survey of legal responses
March 2008
This report provides a survey of legal responses to specific incidents of cluster munition use over the last ten years.